<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
    <title> - PostgreSQL</title>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sysrex.com/tags/postgresql/atom.xml"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sysrex.com"/>
    <generator uri="https://www.getzola.org/">Zola</generator>
    <updated>2024-11-05T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://sysrex.com/tags/postgresql/atom.xml</id>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>PostgreSQL VACUUM and Autovacuum, Explained</title>
        <published>2024-11-05T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-11-05T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>
            
              Unknown
            
          </name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sysrex.com/posts/postgresql-vacuum-explained/"/>
        <id>https://sysrex.com/posts/postgresql-vacuum-explained/</id>
        
        <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;If you&#x27;ve run PostgreSQL in production long enough, you&#x27;ve eventually
looked at &lt;code&gt;pg_stat_user_tables&lt;&#x2F;code&gt;, seen a &lt;code&gt;dead_tup&lt;&#x2F;code&gt; count in the millions,
and wondered what&#x27;s going on. The answer is almost always: not enough
vacuuming.&lt;&#x2F;p&gt;</summary>
        
    </entry>
</feed>
